Are you considering investing in a research function, whether it's a contract or full-time role?
Researchers coming into organizations for the first time learn quickly to use their research skills to better understand the internal environment, instead of focusing solely on users and customers.
In my article How to uncover stakeholder perspectives on research, I propose some ways to get to know key stakeholders.
In a nutshell, here are some best practices:
Read the whole article here: How to uncover stakeholder perspectives on research
I recently discovered Larry Swanson's podcast Content Strategy Insights. He interviewed Sheryl Cababa about her book, Closing the Loop, the one I reviewed for Rosenfeld Media. I love these moments of connection!
Larry is an intuitive interviewer and although I already read the book, I was compelled to jot down some notes:
The systems thinking approach keeps coming back to me. It's an inspiring and inclusive way to view the problem space.
I spent 15 years as an academic researcher before pivoting to in-house roles in tech and now solopreneurship. That's why I get excited about other applied research practitioners who connect academic theory to work in organizational settings.
Case in point: Maria Panagiotidi writes a Substack called UX Psychology, and she recently posted an article called Feeling the Design: The interplay between emotion and attention, and its effect on UX. Maria wants us to consider the importance of users' emotional states when designing products.
When I read her article, what immediately came to mind is the importance of context in this situation. There are "the emotional touchpoints users may experience during their interactions with the product" but then there's the user's pre-existing emotional state when they come in contact with the product.
Take these two examples:
According to the research cited by Maria, flight search for person 1 should prioritize functional aspects, but flight search for person 2 could mean emphasizing aesthetic elements.
Maria's post is such a great example of how we need to understand the full context of the user experience, not just how they navigate the app.
The Problem Space is where we go to learn about our users’ problems so we can design and develop meaningful and profitable solutions to solve these problems. It’s also where we go to learn about our companies, our employees/coworkers, and ourselves, so we can create the best organizational conditions for success.
What's on my mind In this final newsletter of the year, I want to reflect a bit on my writing journey and talk about what's to come in 2024. When I announced the weekly newsletter writing challenge in January, I mentioned that someone had told me: Just write! Write weekly, for an entire year, and you’ll find your way. Some newsletters might bomb. Others might resonate. And in the process, you’ll figure out your winning format. How did it turn out? Let's start with the numbers. From late...
What's on my mind I remember my first UX research interview. I was coming straight from academia and had no on-the-job experience in applied research. The hiring manager told me I needed to show the artifacts that resulted from my research. As a pivoting academic at the time, this sounded very mysterious. What did I create with my research? What was the product that resulted from my insights? I’d never thought about it like that. I had to show the artifacts because the perception, according...
What's on my mind There's a crisis in tech roles - from product to research to design. All of these skills are essential, but how these skills are deployed in an organization - as roles, as parts of roles, and as complimentary with other skills and roles - are all part of a growing conversation. photo by Brendan Church I jumped in with a recent post, written in a moment of reflection on what I've been hearing from coaching clients, people in my network, and seen passing by on LinkedIn: The...